Darwin, Darwinism, naturalism – and ethnocide

For a brief account of a very well-developed understanding of the practices of ethnocide, see the section headed “Robert Jaulin and ethnocide” at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnocide

There can be little argument that Charles Darwin, probably like all Englishmen of his time, had an ethnocidal attitude towards First Peoples when he visited Australia in 1836.

Naturalists of those times also had a sense of identity which promoted them as carriers of civilisation.

Darwin’s comments in relation to his place in the British empire and to First Peoples make his attitude explicitly clear.

Of more lasting concern must be:

1. “To what extent did his ethnocidal attitude inscribe itself – consciously and unconsciously – into his great master works?”

2. “What is the ethnocidal legacy of Darwinism (in its various guises)  and naturalism for First Peoples today?”

Anyone out there addressing these hard questions during the Darwin 200 celebrations?

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s